

The Art of Misdirection & The Unreal   
Report #126
   September 15, 2007
   Joseph P. Skipper
The above first image and the next three      below are from the MRO HiRISE #PSP_003694_1800 science data image. As you      can see, it is a wide-angle context view inclusive from one side of the strip      to the other. The scene is beautifully clean and clear looking with a silky      quality to it and that is so typical of the very high resolution current MRO      camera system images. The MRO stats on this image indicate that this scene      is located in Terra Sabaea south of Janssen Crater but that really isn't important      to us here.
   As you can also see, the darker streaks      relative to the lighter color background are the scene's most eye catching      feature. In the more current MRO data these are described as "slope streaks"      which is a rather neutral identifying moniker in relation to the previous      characterizations of this evidence. In previous science data, these have been      consistently officially described as dust slides down slopes. The theory is      that the upper soil material slides downslope revealing darker geological      material underneath. These characterizations of course reinforce the official      position that Mars in general is a super dry, dusty, dead world.
   You should perhaps also know that some      lay researchers in the field have identified these as water weeps but of course      that, as you might well imagine, didn't get far in the traditional mainstream      science communities who rarely deviate from evidence official designations      once they are made. Now in the over seven years I've been doing this, you      might note that I haven't reported on this type of evidence. Why? Well I usually      don't report on geological evidence because most of the time I leave that      to the geologist unless I believe they are too far off base. However, that's      not my reasoning here. I haven't reported on this simply because I don't buy      into this evidence at all.
   For example, in the above beautifully      clear scene, note all the smoothed textures on everything giving it that silky      look. This isn't the way geology looks and particularly not in satellite imaging      with the very high fine resolution touted in the MRO imaging. When it comes      to rough geology, we should be seeing many times the geological detail we      are seeing here. Any professional worth his salt who has examined satellite      images of Earth's geology even in 10 and 20 year older satellite camera technology      will have to admit that and it isn't because this is super dry dusty Mars      either where geology is covered by dust.
   All one has to do is take a brief look      at the Spirit and Opportunity rover imaging when the surfaces of the rovers      are shown. After many months and even some years trekking around on the Mars      super dry "dusty" surface, the rover hardware surfaces including      all of the onboard great many nooks and crannies and dirt catchers are pristine      clean. Either the rovers in these particular images are not on Mars or, if      one argues that they are, then Mars just clearly isn't all that dusty, at      least not to the degree as portrayed here in this MRO image. You just can't      have your cake and eat it to as the saying goes.
   In my opinion, what we are looking at      in this scene is a demonstration of the art of misdirection and illusions      of the unreal. We are looking at everything being covered by map type smudge      image tampering from one end and side of the strip to the other. It is applied      thin enough in places so that the rougher natural terrain can print through      a bit to the surface giving the scene the vague washed out look of geology.      The streaks are added for effect as eye candy for the researcher's eye to      lock onto rather than be faced with image after image devoid of any such detail      and thereby slowly raising inconvenient questions.
The above second image with its view      to the left and the third image with it view to the right from the same MRO      strip provide a closer of the areas with the primary streaks in the scene.      As you can see, the illusion continues to hold up very well in these substantially      closer views. That's because the much greater camera resolution has enabled      and allowed the tampering applications to now occur at a much closer and finer      level relative to the past and then the scene is drawn back to the distance      you see here for the desired effect.
   You have to understand that we aren't      dealing with a home computer here or even some huge commercial computer and      some commercially available software that does nothing more than what the      user tells it to. I have always been satisfied from the beginning that we      are dealing with super fast computers run by cutting edge proprietary state      of the art and steadily evolving AI (artificial intelligence) technology capable      of learning and making its own extrapolations and decisions (with a little      help from its support group) and using proprietary cutting edge and steadily      evolving combination object recognition and mapping type graphics software      to implement its actions in processing and "fixing" the incoming      data.
   I wouldn't be a bit surprised to learn      that in these more modern times a master system and its redundant backups      control many other systems in this process including systems reviewing and      checking behind systems and redoing images that need it. The raw specially      encrypted so it can't be intercepted data comes in under strict secrecy to      this location first, is processed, then encrypted again to match the original      design science encryption, and then likely bounced back off of the Mars satellite      to come into the normal and waiting Earth computers systems appearing for      all the world like the true raw science data but isn't really and no one is      the wiser.
    That's because the straight well meaning      scientists thinking simply doesn't track along this slippery line as those      do in military, security, and intelligence work. We're exploration scientists      associated with university systems and here is the science data just as we      expected it and from the source we expected to come in from, even if a little      disappointing in lack of hoped for detail. So what's the problem? They just      ignore the very obvious fact that NASA and JPL and so many others associated      with this science are riddled with people right to the very top that either      have direct military security and/or intelligence backgrounds or are civilians      that have long worked with military security and/or intelligence developing      a "cooperative" relationship with it. 
   No, it just can't be, it's just too      fantastic and, like Scarlet's character in the movie Gone With The Wind, I      can't think about that right now or I might add ever! So a pattern of ignoring      it develops that communicates down through the subsequent generations of otherwise      bright and intelligent scientists conditioning and corrupting them thoroughly      in this manner. Meanwhile, over decades the true raw data and its very important      and useful information is retained in secret somewhere for only an elitist      few to have knowledge of and try to figure out a way to capitalize on while      the general science and academic communities and through them the public get      the nice safe appearing sanitized placebo material to float along with thinking      everything is okay and well in hand.
   The process necessarily conditions ignorance      and non thinking into the populations to keep them passive and non interfering      so that subsequent generations focus more and more on shallow matters and      become more and more detached from reality and even recognizing what that      actually is. The process also conditions the subsequent generations of secrecy      elitists more and more into isolation so that eventually they have no feelings      of commonality with the general populations and come to regard us more and      more as merely a resource to be capitalized on, manipulated without qualm,      and perhaps even expendable. Does this sound like a good thing to you? It      doesn't to me.
In any case, the above fourth image      from the same MRO strip is the site a little lower down in the first presented      context image. The only thing this scene tells us beyond what we are suppose      to see is that some spot tampering applications as represented by the yellow      text in the above image were applied after the streaks were applied and on      top of them ever so slightly overlapping the tops of the streaks and very      subtly only in that way revealing themselves in the process. This demonstrates      that first the basic tampering was done applying what becomes the smudge general      background, next the darker streaks were applied on top of this background      as the eye candy to catch and misdirect the eye, but something was still coming      through in these spots on follow-up and so secondary spot applications of      matching smudge labeled in yellow text were applied.
   Unfortunately these few very subtle      clues are all that we have now as evidence of the presence of the map type      tampering and obfuscation of this newer MRO imaging. One has to understand      that the tampering technology has had a chance to evolve and fix its mistakes      over the years and become much more effective and particularly with respect      to creating illusions and thereby misdirection. Further, this tampering progress      is significantly enhanced by the ability to make the applications down at      minute size scales never admitted to so that when the image is drawn back      to the publicly released much more distant scale, such applications are very      difficult to detect as you can see above.
   As for true color images, they are of      course more difficult to obscure because it makes evidence stand out familiar      to the eye. That means it can't be allowed and any future substitute to pass      off as original must be very good and well beyond the ESA artificial colorized      imaging. Rather they use the real color imaging to gather data for their own      secret purposes as well as stock pile hundreds of thousands of color images      into a database that will go into making the next generation of tampering      using color as effective as needed to pass off as real.
   As this map type      tampering technology progresses, the colorizing aspect will soon reach the      level, if not already, where they will feel confident that artificial color      can be applied with a sufficiently realistic effect and then that addition      more easily passed off as the real thing in future imaging. You can count      on it! I'm satisfied that the real unobfuscated true satellite imaging raw      data held in secret somewhere has been in color since at least before the      MGS MOC data probably at least as far back as the Clementine Moon data and      most definitely includes the current MRO data. We are never going to see it      unless they feel that they have no choice but to allow it.
   That is where the Planetary Truth Project      will eventually come into the picture to do something about this. Meanwhile,      I digress. We've seen the slope streaks in the MRO imaging, now lets see some      of the same type of evidence in the older MGS MOC imaging as appears below      for comparison purposes.
Found Here:   http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2007/126/image-illusions.htm

